Skip to content

Hyper-sexualized AI Down syndrome content is going viral in latest sick trend

In videos that are going viral on those platforms, typical facial features associated with Down syndrome are being superimposed over the faces of scantily clad women engaged in sexually suggestive behavior with artificial intelligence.

The posts — which often redirect users to OnlyFans accounts, other porn sites or Telegram groups — are getting hundreds of thousands of views a pop, and they have individuals with Down syndrome and disability advocates alarmed about fetishization and exploitation.

“It makes me feel a myriad of things,” Charlotte Woodward, a 35-year-old woman with Down syndrome, told The Post. “Not only do I find it disturbing, I find it personally upsetting. I also feel anger and outrage.”

Captions that go along with the posts are sexualized and exploitative.

Typical captions include, “Is Down syndrome a deal breaker for you?,” ”Would you date a girl with Down syndrome?” or “Does Down syndrome change how you feel about me?,” as well as others far more lewd.

Woodward, who works as a programs associate for the National Down Syndrome Society, believes this sort of content puts people like her in harm’s way.

“I just feel as if it’s putting people with Down syndrome at risk of sexual abuse and sexual assault,” she worried.

It’s unclear who exactly is behind the dozens of Instagram and TikTok pages that have popped up in recent months to pump out this content, but most appear to steal videos from scantily clad female stars, then apply an AI filter to them over their faces.

Many different account names are using the same videos and linking to the same few OnlyFans accounts.

While it’s impossible to tell what platform these internet trolls are using to transform the faces, TikTok has multiple controversial Down syndrome filters available to users.

The Post reached out to TikTok for comment but did not hear back.

Undoubtedly, though, the creators behind these accounts are raking in money from the videos’ morbid sexual curiosity, between monetizing views and raking in OnlyFans subscriptions.

“The social media posts that are more sexual in nature are just exploiting disability for entertainment and clicks,” Kandi Pickard, CEO of the National Down Syndrome Society, told The Post. “Disability is not a trend.”

Undoubtedly, though, the creators behind these accounts are raking in money from the videos’ morbid sexual curiosity, between monetizing views and raking in OnlyFans subscriptions.

She’s had families of individuals with autism reach out upset and concerned about this trend over the past couple of months, as such content has exploded online.

“It’s been on our radar,” Packard says. “We’ve been really monitoring this surge in fake online social media accounts.”

As with so much of the internet, there’s apparently a real demand for this strange new niche content.

Instagram auto-fills searches for “down syndrome” by suggesting “beautiful girl” and “down syndrome dance,” which implies users are on the hunt for such content. They return endless pages of artificially generated, highly sexualized content.

“Our Community Standards apply to all content posted on our platforms regardless of whether it’s AI-generated, and we take action against any content that violates these policies,” said a spokesperson for Meta, which owns Instagram.

OnlyFans’ rules on AI-generated or -enhanced content are that it can only be posted by registered creators and the content must feature that person and make clear to the viewer that AI is being used.

“Do I look cute even if I have Down syndrome,” a post asks. “Would my D syndrome not make your D hard,” another more direct one reads. “Syndrome is down but your d—k is up,” another quips.

Today's News.
For Conservatives.
Every Single Day.

News Opt-in
(Optional) By checking this box you are opting in to receive news notifications from News Rollup. Text HELP for help, STOP to end. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency varies. Privacy Policy & Terms: textsinfo.com/PP
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.